Key result
24 mEq IV magnesium sulfate shows no significant AKI benefit over 12 mEq post-cisplatin.
Why the study?
The dose-dependent nature of intravenous magnesium supplementation for nephroprotection during cisplatin-based chemotherapy remains poorly defined, and most studies have not evaluated long-term renal outcomes.
Does 24 mEq IV magnesium sulfate prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity better than 12 mEq in patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy?
Cohort (n=287)
Yes
Does 24 mEq IV magnesium sulfate prevent cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity better than 12 mEq in patients undergoing cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy?
Absolute Event Rate: 13.2% vs 17.7%
p-value: p=0.32
Prophylactic administration of 24 mEq IV magnesium sulfate provides sustained, dose-dependent renal protection against cisplatin-induced nephrotoxicity compared to a 12 mEq dose.
Supports higher-dose IV magnesium to reduce cisplatin nephrotoxicity; leaves open ideal regimen pending confirmatory RCTs.
BACKGROUND: Intravenous magnesium supplementation is increasingly adopted as a nephroprotective measure in patients receiving cisplatin-based chemotherapy, particularly in several Asian and European oncology centers. However, the dose-dependent nature of this effect remains poorly defined, and most studies have not addressed long-term renal outcomes. METHODS: In this multicenter retrospective study, 287 patients undergoing weekly cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy for head and neck or cervical cancer were stratified based on prophylactic magnesium dose: 12 mEq or 24 mEq IV magnesium sulfate. Serum creatinine (sCr) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were measured at baseline, during treatment, and up to 12 months post-treatment. The incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) was defined using CTCAE v5.0 criteria. Comparative analysis was performed using standard statistical tests, and results were contextualized with recent large-scale cohort findings. RESULTS: AKI incidence was 17.7% in the 12 mEq group and 13.2% in the 24 mEq group (p = 0.32). However, longitudinal renal follow-up revealed a significant divergence in sCr and eGFR trajectories: the 24 mEq cohort maintained near-baseline renal function, whereas the 12 mEq group exhibited progressive deterioration at 6 and 12 months. These findings contrast with prior binary exposure studies and indicate a sustained, dose-dependent protective effect. CONCLUSIONS: Magnesium's renoprotective benefit in cisplatin-based therapy is not only determined by its presence, but also by its dose. Our results support the incorporation of standardized magnesium dosing, specifically a minimum of 24 mEq, into clinical protocols. Dose precision, not merely inclusion, should guide prophylactic strategies to ensure effective renal protection.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Önder et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Head and neck or cervical cancer undergoing cisplatin-based chemoradiotherapy (n=287). Intravenous magnesium sulfate vs. 12 mEq IV magnesium sulfate was evaluated on Incidence of acute kidney injury (AKI) (p=0.32). Prophylactic intravenous magnesium sulfate at 24 mEq compared to 12 mEq did not significantly reduce AKI incidence (13.2% vs 17.7%, p=0.32), but prevented progressive long-term renal deterioration.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: