Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Psychology cannot linger indefinitely in a state of foundational fragility, conceptual stagnation, and methodological aporia. Existing paradigms are unintelligible, ambiguous, unverifiable and/or fail upon experimental verification. A new paradigm is an existential imperative for the field. This paper succinctly proposes the following: (1) a grand theory that explains human dynamics on the basis of a triadic relationship among intelligence, cognition, and behavior, in which intelligence is defined as the information technological ability, cognition is defined as the brain’s innate, auto-generated, self-developed, and assimilated algorithms to interact with milieu exterior, and the scope of behavior is confined to its overt domain; (2) a client-centric approach that serves to improve brain’s ecological intelligence’s aspects of seeking and processing data and/or information, and rectify, develop, and/or optimize cognition; and (3) the development of a diagnostic manual that advocates reverse engineering of existing exigencies, rather than imposing arbitrary frameworks on clients and manufacturing artificial imperatives.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gowryshankar (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: