Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
An equilateral-triangle arrangement with 120° spacing is widely used for omnidirectional mobile mechanisms employing three omni wheels. However, the 120° arrangement itself, driving experiments with variable wheel-placement angles, and mobility evaluations of arbitrary or asymmetric arrangements have already been reported; therefore, the novelty of this study does not lie in proposing the equilateral arrangement. Here, the placement angle of a line-symmetric three-omni-wheel mechanism is treated as a single design variable, and performance measures derived from different physical principles—translational isotropy, worst-case kinematic input effort, three-point support stability, normal-load distribution, and the worst-case required coefficient of Coulomb friction—are analyzed within a common geometric model. For a centered center of mass (CoM), the optimal angles of these independent measures are shown in closed form to coincide at 120°. For a center-of-mass offset restricted to the symmetry-axis direction, a complete planar force-and-moment balance is introduced, accounting for both static load redistribution and the moment generated by the translational force acting at the offset center of mass. Consequently, the support-optimal angle that maximizes support stability and the friction-optimal angle that minimizes the friction requirement separate, and their difference increases with the offset. Thus, this study establishes, in a single analytical framework, both the “unified optimality” by which independent design optima coincide at 120° under symmetric conditions and the mechanical mechanism by which CoM offset breaks that coincidence.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kenji Kimura (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: