Key result
Acute infection impairs endothelial function, with brachial FMD recovering significantly by one month.
Why the study?
While some studies link chronic infections and inflammation to endothelial dysfunction, data regarding the effects of acute infections and their potential mediators on endothelial function are scant.
Does acute infection impair endothelial function and alter inflammatory and lipid mediators compared to 1 month after recovery in patients without coronary artery disease?
Cohort (n=40)
Does acute infection impair endothelial function and alter inflammatory and lipid mediators compared to 1 month after recovery in patients without coronary artery disease?
Acute infection induces transient endothelial dysfunction and an atherogenic lipid profile that resolves 1 month after recovery, mediated in part by reductions in Apo-A1.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
May signal transient post-infectious vascular vulnerability; hypothesis-generating for Apo-A1 mediation of endothelial recovery.
OBJECTIVES: Inflammation plays an important role in the pathophysiology of atherosclerosis. Some studies suggest a link between chronic infections, an inflammatory state, and endothelial dysfunction. However, data related to acute infections are scant. We have investigated: (i) the effect of acute infection on endothelial function; (ii) the role of potential mediators of endothelial dysfunction. METHODS: Forty patients 40 years old with acute infection (mean age 53.9 +/- 8.8 years), without coronary artery disease or its equivalents were enrolled. Endothelial function and blood levels of high sensitive C-reactive protein, interleukin-6, tumour necrosis factor-a, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL), low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL), apolipoprotein-A1 (Apo-A1) and apolipoprotein-B100 (Apo-B100) were assessed in the acute infection phase and 1 month after recovery. Endothelial function was evaluated by brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD). RESULTS: The intraclass correlation coefficients for intra- and interobserver agreement for FMD measurements were 0.98 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99) and 0.93 (95% CI: 0.83-0.97), respectively. FMD improved significantly 1 month after recovery (P < 0.001). Compared to the levels at 1 month, inflammatory markers, LDL cholesterol, LDL/HDL ratio, Apo-B100 and Apo-B100/Apo-A1 ratio were significantly higher. However, HDL and apo-A1 were significantly lower in the phase of acute infection. Change in FMD from baseline to 1 month after recovery correlated significantly only with the change in Apo-A1 (r = 0.35, P = 0.027). CONCLUSIONS: Acute infection causes transient endothelial dysfunction. It increases inflammatory markers and generates an atherogenic lipid profile. Among the parameters evaluated, only the change in Apo-A1 level was associated with acute infection-induced endothelial dysfunction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kılıçkap et al. (2011) conducted a cohort in Acute infection without coronary artery disease or its equivalents (n=40). Acute infection vs. 1 month after recovery from acute infection was evaluated on Endothelial function evaluated by brachial artery flow-mediated vasodilation (FMD) (p=<0.001). Acute infection caused transient endothelial dysfunction with brachial artery FMD improving at 1 month (P<0.001), correlating with Apo-A1 changes (r=0.35, P=0.027).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: