Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Research Articles| June 26 2008 MITOTIC RATES, RENEWAL TIMES, AND CYTODYNAMICS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL TRACT EPITHELIA IN THE RAT Subject Area: Further Areas , Pathology and Cell Biology Felix D. Bertalanffy; Felix D. Bertalanffy Department of Anatomy, Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Chosen Lau Chosen Lau Department of Anatomy, Faculties of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada Search for other works by this author on: This Site PubMed Google Scholar Acta Anatomica (1963) 54 (1-2): 39–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000142437 Article history Received: May 04 1963 Published Online: June 26 2008 Content Tools Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Email Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation Felix D. Bertalanffy, Chosen Lau; MITOTIC RATES, RENEWAL TIMES, AND CYTODYNAMICS OF THE FEMALE GENITAL TRACT EPITHELIA IN THE RAT. Acta Anatomica 31 December 1963; 54 (1-2): 39–81. https://doi.org/10.1159/000142437 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentAll JournalsActa Anatomica Search Advanced Search Article PDF first page preview Close Modal This content is only available via PDF. 1963Copyright / Drug Dosage / DisclaimerCopyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher.Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug.Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements. You do not currently have access to this content.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bertalanffy et al. (2008) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: