Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
To examine the safety and feasibility of a two-week (seven-session) tele-based ischemic conditioning (tele-IC) intervention in individuals with chronic stroke and to explore secondary neurophysiological and motor outcomes. METHODS: Ten individuals with chronic stroke (8 males; age 61.7 ± 7.3 years; time since stroke 11.5 ± 7.5 years; Fugl-Meyer Lower Extremity score 20.5 ± 6.6) completed tele-IC. The primary outcomes were safety and feasibility. Safety was assessed through monitoring of IC-related adverse events and side effects across sessions; feasibility was evaluated through screening-to-enrollment, retention, intervention adherence, tolerability, and acceptability. Secondary exploratory outcomes included corticomotor excitability, transcallosal inhibition, lower-limb strength, paretic ankle motor control, and gait speed. Outcomes were assessed before and 24 h after the intervention. RESULTS: Across 70 tele-IC sessions, no serious adverse events occurred, and all 10 participants completed all seven sessions. Acceptability was high, including ratings for safety (4.9/5), remote assistance (4.8/5), and overall satisfaction (4.8/5). Exploratory analyses showed increased transcallosal inhibition (d_z = 0.929, p = 0.017), changes in bilateral lower-limb strength (d_z = 0.873-1.756), and shorter paretic ankle reaction time (d_z = 0.844, p = 0.049). Corticomotor excitability and gait speed did not significantly change. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, uncontrolled pilot study, synchronously supervised tele-IC was delivered with complete intervention adherence, no serious adverse events, and high participant acceptability. Exploratory secondary neurophysiological and motor findings require confirmation in larger controlled trials.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Madhavan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: