Key result
LV segmental strain on speckle tracking predicts CMR myocardial fibrosis with an AUC of ~0.64.
Why the study?
This study aimed to comprehensively assess LV function using speckle tracking echocardiography in children in the late postoperative period after correction of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, and to compare segmental longitudinal and circumferential LV deformation with CMR myocardial late enhancement.
Does left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiography predict myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance in children after correction of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in the late postoperative period?
Observational (n=25)
Does left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiography predict myocardial fibrosis on cardiac magnetic resonance in children after correction of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in the late postoperative period?
In children in the late postoperative period after correction of anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery, segmental LV longitudinal deformation on speckle tracking echocardiography shows modest accuracy (AUC 0.64) in predicting CMR-detected myocardial fibrosis, whereas circumferential deformation does not (AUC 0.48).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Modest accuracy of segmental LV strain for fibrosis detection; leaves open its role in post-ALCAPA surveillance pending prospective validation.
The aim of our study is a comprehensive echo assessment of the LV function using the speckle tracking technique in children with abnormal origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery in the late postoperative period аnd a comparative analysis segmental longitudinal and circumferential LV deformation with cardiac magnetic resonance late enhancement of myocardium. Methods. The search is a prospective observational study. We examined and analyzed 25 children with AOLCA from PA in late postoperative period. Obtained morphofunctional LV and RV echo parameters were compared with LV ejection fraction and dimensions, the grade of mitral insufficiency and age at the time of operation. CMR was performed in 15 patients (60%; n = 15/25) using Avanto 1.5T. The average age of children at the time of the study was 8.8 ± 3.5 years. Results. 1) Reduce of LV segmental longitudinal deformation is unique in each patient’s case. The largest number of segments with reduced longitudinal deformation was detected in the 2d (anteroseptal basal); in 4th (inferior basal); 5th (inferolateral basal), 6th (anterolateral basal), 11th (inferolateral middle) segments of LV myocardium. 2) There is no relationship between LV global longitudinal and circumferential deformation in children in the late postoperative period after correction of AOLCA from PA and initial LV morphological and functional echo data (at the time of defect correction). 3) Segmental LV longitudinal deformation Area Under the Curve is 0.64 (0.56–0.72) with “cut-off” 9.5% with a sensitivity of 92% and a specificity of 85% and circumferential segmental deformity Area Under the Curve is 0.48 (0.40–0.56) in the predicting of fibrosis according to CMR data.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Baryshnikova et al. (2023) conducted an observational in Anomalous origin of the left coronary artery from the pulmonary artery (AOLCA from PA) in the late postoperative period (n=25). Left ventricular speckle tracking echocardiography (segmental longitudinal and circumferential deformation) vs. Cardiac magnetic resonance late enhancement of myocardium was evaluated on Prediction of myocardial fibrosis according to cardiac magnetic resonance late enhancement (AUC 0.64, 95% CI 0.56-0.72). Segmental LV longitudinal deformation on speckle tracking echo predicted CMR myocardial fibrosis with an AUC of 0.64 (95% CI 0.56-0.72; 92% sensitivity, 85% specificity at a 9.5% cut-off).
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: