Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Published in Petroleum Transactions, AIME, Vol. 216, 1959, pages 98–105.Paper presented at 33rd Annual Fall Meeting of Society of Petroleum Engineers in Houston, Tex., Oct. 5–8, 1958. ABSTRACT By mathematical analysis it was found that injectivity history of a uniform five-spot pattern can be calculated by rather simple formulas. These calculated injectivities were found to agree rather well with injectivities measured in a potentiometric analog. With this as a basis, a simple method was finally developed which allows prediction not only of rate of injection but also of rate and kind of production at the production well, for a uniform five-spot. Using this method formulas for the effective injectivity and production behavior of a waterflooded reservoir having a wide range in permeability can be calculated by considering that the reservoir consists of several layers, each having a uniform but different permeability. Rather good agreement is shown by a comparison of the observed production history of a field in the Illinois basin and that calculated by the methods just described. INTRODUCTION The importance of being able to predict the injection rates for a water flood is well known, for upon injection rate depends the life of the flood, the size of pumping and treating facilities, and the rate of oil recovery. One method of determining rates of injection is through a pilot flood.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Prats et al. (1959) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: