Key result
Carotid accelerometer sensing captures radial pulse motion well but still requires tactile sensors for displacement waveforms.
Why the study?
The feasibility of accelerometer-based arterial pulse measurement at the carotid artery needed to be experimentally evaluated in comparison with tactile-based measurement.
Does accelerometer-based arterial pulse measurement accurately acquire arterial pulse waveforms and cardiovascular indices compared to tactile-based measurement at the carotid artery?
Does accelerometer-based arterial pulse measurement accurately acquire arterial pulse waveforms and cardiovascular indices compared to tactile-based measurement at the carotid artery?
While analog accelerometer-based measurement of radial carotid wall motion offers a simple approach for cardiovascular assessment, tactile-based measurement remains necessary for reliable pulse signal acquisition and accurate derivation of cardiovascular indices.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports continued reliance on conventional tactile sensing for clinical carotid pulse assessment; leaves open whether accelerometer signal correction can enable accurate wearable hemodynamic monitoring.
This study, the second of two parts, experimentally investigates accelerometer (ACC)-based arterial pulse measurement in comparison with tactile-based measurement. Two ACCs, one digital and one analog, were used to measure radial, lateral, and axial arterial wall motions at the carotid artery (CA) in a total of ten subjects. Subsequently, both the analog ACC and a tactile sensor were used to conduct measurements sequentially at the CA of another three subjects. A single-degree-of-freedom time-frequency (SDOF-TF) method was applied to the measured acceleration signals to remove motion artifacts (MA) and sensor noise, reconstruct the pulse waveform in the acceleration domain, APWa, and displacement domain, APW, and extract arterial indices. The same method was applied to the displacement signals measured by the tactile sensor. The results reveal that the analog ACC acquires higher-quality pulse signals than the digital ACC. Radial wall motion measured by the ACC corresponds well with the pulse signal measured by the tactile sensor, whereas axial wall motion presents substantial practical challenges for reliable measurement for cardiovascular (CV) assessment. Compared with tactile-based measurements, ACC-based measurements present two practical challenges: (1) achieving firm sensor fixation and (2) the acceleration-sensing nature of the ACC, which permits extraction of only APWa and its associated arterial indices, rather than APW. They also exhibit two fundamental differences: (1) as theoretically identified in Part I, acceleration sensing introduces an additional term into the instantaneous frequency (IF) of individual arterial pulse harmonics, thereby affecting both the IF-based arterial indices and the frequency spectrum of the IF; and (2) variations in the tissue-contact sensor (TCS) stacks contribute to substantial differences in the normalized harmonic amplitude distributions between ACC-based and tactile-based measurements. Overall, ACC-based measurement provides a simple approach for CV assessment; however, tactile-based measurement remains necessary for reliable acquisition of arterial pulse signals and accurate CV indices.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hasan et al. (2026) studied Carotid artery wall motion and arterial pulse measurement (n=13). Accelerometer-based arterial pulse measurement (digital and analog) vs. Tactile sensor-based arterial pulse measurement was evaluated on Arterial pulse waveform reconstruction (acceleration domain APWa and displacement domain APW) and extracted arterial indices. Accelerometer-based measurement in 13 subjects captured radial carotid motion well, though tactile sensing remains needed for reliable displacement waveforms.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: