Key result
Emerging biomarkers and multi-omics profiling combined with machine learning may improve heart failure phenotyping and risk stratification, but remain investigational pending prospective validation.
Why the study?
Natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins are established biomarkers for heart failure diagnosis and risk assessment, but they do not fully capture the biological heterogeneity and progression of the syndrome.
Does multidimensional biomarker profiling and multi-omics integration improve phenotyping and risk stratification compared to established biomarkers in patients with heart failure?
Does multidimensional biomarker profiling and multi-omics integration improve phenotyping and risk stratification compared to established biomarkers in patients with heart failure?
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This narrative review highlights that while emerging biomarkers and multi-omics strategies paired with machine learning offer promising insights into heart failure pathophysiology and risk stratification, they remain largely investigational and require rigorous prospective validation before routine clinical adoption.
Heart failure is a complex clinical syndrome involving neurohormonal activation, myocardial injury, inflammation, fibrosis, metabolic dysregulation, and cardiorenal dysfunction. Natriuretic peptides and cardiac troponins are established biomarkers for diagnosis and risk assessment, but they do not fully capture the biological heterogeneity and progression of heart failure. This narrative review examined emerging biomarkers through targeted searches of PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science for literature published between January 2010 and January 2026, with earlier landmark studies included when relevant. The review focused on biomarkers, multi-omics approaches, precision cardiology, and machine learning in heart failure, emphasizing pathophysiological mechanisms, clinical utility, and translational potential. Emerging biomarkers include growth differentiation factor-15, soluble neprilysin, adrenomedullin, microRNAs, and extracellular vesicle-derived biomarkers. Genomics, transcriptomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and epigenomics further provide opportunities for systems-level molecular characterization. Pathophysiological processes such as inflammation, oxidative stress, extracellular matrix remodelling, endothelial dysfunction, and metabolic perturbations may be captured through multidimensional biomarker strategies. Integration of high-dimensional molecular and clinical data with machine learning may improve phenotyping and risk assessment in selected populations. Despite these advances, most emerging approaches remain investigational because of challenges involving standardization, reproducibility, external validation, clinical utility, cost-effectiveness, and ethical considerations. Multidimensional biomarker profiling may support precision cardiology, but prospective validation and implementation research are required before routine clinical adoption.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Maryam (2026) conducted a review in Heart Failure. Emerging biomarkers and multi-omics profiling (e.g., GDF-15, soluble neprilysin, adrenomedullin, microRNAs, extracellular vesicles) vs. Established biomarkers (BNP, NT-proBNP, cardiac troponins) was evaluated. Emerging biomarkers and multi-omics profiling combined with machine learning may improve heart failure phenotyping and risk stratification, but remain investigational pending prospective validation.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: