Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Children with dyslexia often experience persistent challenges in reading, motivation, and self-regulation within traditional classroom settings that rely on uniform instructional approaches. With the growing integration of artificial intelligence in education, AI-based adaptive learning systems have emerged as innovative tools capable of personalizing instruction and supporting diverse learning needs. This study investigated the effect of AI-based adaptive learning systems on reading performance, motivation, and self-regulation among primary school students with dyslexia in Abuja, Nigeria. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design was adopted, with a sample of 60 Primary 5 pupils drawn from selected inclusive and special education schools in the Abuja Municipal Area. Data were collected using a Reading Performance Test, Motivation toward Reading Scale, and Self-Regulation in Reading Questionnaire, and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistics, including independent samples t-test. Findings revealed that students exposed to AI-based adaptive learning demonstrated significantly higher improvements across all variables compared to those receiving conventional instruction. The experimental group recorded substantial gains in reading performance (mean gain = 24.20), motivation (mean gain = 1.50), and self-regulation (mean gain = 1.60), compared to the control group. Statistical analysis confirmed that these differences were significant (p < 0.05). These findings align with Cognitive Load Theory, Self-Determination Theory, and Vygotsky’s Zone of Proximal Development. The study concludes that AI-based adaptive learning systems offer an effective approach for improving both academic and psychological outcomes among students with dyslexia. It recommends the integration of AI-driven instructional tools in primary education, alongside teacher training and policy support, to promote inclusive, personalized, and effective learning environments.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Alfa et al. (2026) studied this question.