Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In July 2025 the International Court of Justice (ICJ) handed down its landmark advisory opinion on the obligations of states in respect of climate change. The unanimous opinion is multifaceted and builds upon the growing canon of climate change jurisprudence that has emerged from three decades of domestic, regional and international climate change litigation across the world. This article explores how the ICJ’s opinion may be implemented in domestic climate change decision-making and how it may influence climate change litigation. Through a focus on the opinion’s potential impact in Australia, and by reviewing how the Paris Agreement has to this point influenced climate change decision-making and litigation, this article finds that the ICJ’s authoritative findings present opportunities for ambitious climate decision-making, fresh avenues for potential climate litigants, and greater prospects for climate accountability.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Gracie et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: