Synapse
⌘+K
Synapse
PulseExploreClubsResearchersJournals
Instagram
HomeClubsExplore
June 1, 2024Georgetown journal of international affairs

The Limits of Advisory Opinions in the Pursuit of Climate Justice through International Courts

View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Authors

SRStacy‐ann RobinsonEmory UniversityEBEli Bertan

Discussion

Loading...

Member takes

Implication

Key Points

Key points are not available for this paper at this time.

Cite This Study

Robinson et al. (2024) studied this question.

synapsesocial.com/papers/68e66eefb6db6435875f993fhttps://doi.org/10.1353/gia.2024.a934885
View Full Paper
Ask AI
Bookmark
Share

Also Consider

Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context:

  1. 1Opening the doors: Legal consequences of breaching international climate obligations in the ICJ Advisory Opinion on climate change2026 · 2 citations
  2. 2Situating the ICJ's advisory opinion in the wider ecosystem of international climate litigation2026
  3. 3Methodological Innovations in the ICJ's Climate Advisory Opinion: A Systemic and Science-Based Approach to International Law2026
  4. 4In between the missed opportunities and future possibilities: human rights in the ICJ's advisory opinion on climate change and the prospects for climate litigation2026
  5. 5Obligations of States to Protect Climate: Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice2025