Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Repeated transurethral resection of bladder tumour (TURBT) can impose substantial procedural burden in recurrent non-muscle-invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC). We evaluated hospital-based holmium laser treatment under local anaesthesia in patients with comorbidity and high perioperative burden. This single-centre retrospective cohort included 155 of 326 patients assessed for local treatment (47.5%), within a screening population of 1,076 patients. Selection combined anaesthetic assessment, shared decision-making and endoscopic suitability, generally requiring no more than five lesions, maximum diameter ≤ 20 mm and cumulative diameter ≤ 40 mm. Follow-up began at the first laser procedure. The primary endpoint was subsequent TURBT under general or neuraxial anaesthesia; oncological outcomes were examined separately by pre-laser disease history. Median age was 76 years, and 94.2% were ASA III–IV. During median reverse Kaplan–Meier follow-up of 4.8 years (observed range 0.80–10.12), 314 laser procedures were recorded. Fifty patients subsequently underwent TURBT. The five-year probability without TURBT was 63.6% (95% CI 54.2–71.5), compared with 90.3% in the Ta low-grade history group and 32.2% in the T1 high-grade/carcinoma in situ group. Recurrence occurred in 94 patients; 47 (50.0%) had no subsequent TURBT. All eight muscle-invasive progressions occurred in the T1 high-grade/carcinoma in situ group. Median index procedure duration was 21 min. Thirty unplanned post-procedural events affected 29 patients, including 11 admissions. Local-anaesthetic holmium laser treatment provided a practical option for selected recurrent NMIBC in patients with substantial perioperative burden. Many patients had no subsequent anaesthetised TURBT during follow-up despite recurrence, particularly those with a Ta low-grade history. High-grade/T1/CIS disease followed a less favourable course and requires separate oncological assessment. The findings inform patient selection and counselling within this treatment pathway. Not applicable.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
İvelik et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: