Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Determining an unknown flow parameter from a limited number of experimental measurement data is an essential requirement for many engineering problems. Inverse physics-informed neural network (I-PINN) provide a mesh-free way unlike the usual adjoint- or conjugategradient-based methods by adding the unknown parameter as a trainable one along with other weights of the neural network during the training phase. In this paper, we study the effective sensor placement for a flow past a circular cylinder to recover the Reynolds number (π π) of the flow. We consider five zones in the flow independently and try to recover the π π from synthetic data obtained from the validated forward PINN. In the first of three sweeps, the near-, mid-, and far-wake zones recover π π to within 9.9β21.6% error whereas the shear-layer zone stays in a tighter 28.2β31.7% error band. The upstream zone which samples the near uniform free stream values comes out to be the ineffective almost every time at 46.3β54.1%. The two repeat sweeps shift these errors, but the wake zones stay the most accurate in all three. We also see that more sensors do not translate into better accuracy in any zone, which implies that sensor location matters more than sensor count for recovering π π.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Palli et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: