Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Justification: The teaching of Natural Sciences requires instructional approaches that foster the understanding of phenomena and the development of scientific skills, which has increased interest in methodologies aimed at a more active construction of knowledge. Objective: To identify the innovative methodologies applied to the teaching of Natural Sciences in Basic General Education in Ecuador and synthesize the results obtained from their implementation. Methodology: A systematic literature review was conducted following the PRISMA 2020 guidelines. Twenty-eight empirical studies conducted in Ecuador were included, and their data were examined through descriptive and narrative synthesis. Results: Gamification was the most frequently used methodology (42.9%), followed by the flipped classroom (21.4%) and project-based learning (14.3%), along with other less frequently used methodologies. In studies using pretest-posttest measurements, gamification yielded an average increase of 1.66 points. In addition, the methodologies analyzed showed favorable results in content comprehension, scientific skills, critical thinking, problem-solving, motivation, participation, autonomy, and collaboration. Conclusion: The synthesized evidence supports the incorporation of innovative methodologies as alternatives for broadening approaches to learning Natural Sciences in Basic General Education; however, differences in research designs and learning assessment still prevent determining which methodology is most appropriate for the specific learning outcomes to be developed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zambrano et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: