Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The article investigates the decolonial concept of pluriversality in confrontation with Hegel’s philosophy. Pluriversality is a universal project of decolonization of knowledge stemming from criticism of Eurocentric universalism often epitomized by Hegel’s philosophy. In place of Western abstract universality, decolonial theorists offer a multitude of the particulars. However, their engagement in the relation between universality and particularity exhibits, despite declarations, a fundamental dualism related to “geospatialization” of colonial West and decolonial rest, the Global South. I argue that pluriversality represents a false concrete universality, and that resorting to dialectical understanding of autonomy and freedom brought by Hegel offers a way out of the forfeiture of the emancipatory vocation of decolonial theory. Such engagement in Hegel’s philosophy implies a rethinking of Hegel’s most, in this context, criticized philosophy of history and a revision of the view on Hegel’s coloniality.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Stanisław Bogdanowicz (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: