Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Attention-based rerankers score each candidate by the attention mass that retrieval heads route to it from the question, but the question, serving as a fixed query, carries limited information for locating relevant evidence. We propose Re³Rank, a listwise reranker built on reasoning-conditioned retrieval heads (RRHeads). A generator first writes a reasoning trace over the question and the candidates, and a scorer then uses the trace tokens as the attention query of a few selected RRHeads, reading relevance as continuous scores. We present a straight-through estimator to propagate the ranking loss through the discrete trace, so that the generator and the scorer can be trained jointly for ranking. Averaged over 9 benchmarks, Re³Rank outperforms 11 baseline rerankers: our 4B variant exceeds the strongest baseline by 3.11 NDCG@10 points on average, and even our 0.6B variant surpasses rerankers with up to 32B parameters.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Yan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: