Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper examines whether Bitcoin–Ethereum return divergence is associated with changes in cryptocurrency market connectedness across distributional states. Daily returns for twelve cryptocurrencies (2018–2026) are analyzed using TVP-VAR connectedness, quantile regression, quantile-on-quantile regression, and quantile-on-quantile VAR connectedness. The market is highly integrated (average Total Connectedness Index of 80.10%, corrected 87.38%), with Ethereum and Bitcoin as primary net transmitters. Signed and absolute BTC–ETH return differentials convey distinct information: signed differentials matter only in selected regions, whereas absolute differentials show clear asymmetry where moderate divergence relates to lower changes in connectedness and larger divergence coincides with greater changes in connectedness. Predictive spillovers intensify toward distribution tails, with direct quantile configurations dominating. Relative BTC–ETH performance emerges as a state-dependent indicator of cryptocurrency market integration, with the informational relevance of return divergence magnitude and direction varying across distributional states.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Candelo-Viáfara et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: