Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Vision can sample objects remotely and over a broad field, whereas touch is restricted to contacted skin and is often spatially serial however might outperform vision in resolution by transforming spatial information to a temporal code. This raises the question on how multisensory exploration is coordinated. We recorded gaze and or touch location in exploration of 60 three-dimensional surfaces with locally varying textures during visual, haptic and bimodal exploration while participants performed a same/different task, judging whether a second texture matched the first. In bimodal exploration, gaze and touch became more spatially similar than during unimodal exploration, while touch changed less than vision between unimodal and bimodal contexts. A temporal overlap analysis further showed that touch preceded gaze on average during the first 5 s of bimodal exploration. We then increased visual discriminability of the textures using cast-shadow illumination. A psychophysical pilot confirmed improved texture discrimination, and a new participant group showed a strong shift towards vision-leading exploration. Thus, sensory leadership during active visuo-haptic exploration is not fixed: touch can lead vision when texture information is important, but the balance adapts when visual information becomes more diagnostic.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ahmadi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: