Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The importance of mechanotransduction as a key regulator of immune-cell function has grown, linking the tissue microenvironment to cell phenotype, activity, and response to therapy. Mechanobiology and stimuli-responsive biomaterials are converging to become a new approach to precision immunomodulation, the focus of this review. The roles of matrix stiffness, viscoelasticity, confinement, and nanoscale topography in sensing by integrins, focal-adhesion complexes, Piezo1, YAP/TAZ and nuclear mechanotransduction by LINC complexes, and their influence on cytoskeletal organization, transcriptional programs, and immune-cell function, are described. We then explore how macrophages, dendritic cells, T cells, neutrophils, monocytes, and regulatory immune cells combine these mechanical signals with biochemical signaling. We focus on stiffness-tunable, stress-relaxing, adaptive, self-healing, and architecture biomaterials, as well as magnetic, electrical, photonic, acoustic, and multi-stimuli-responsive platforms. They are evaluated for therapeutic roles in cancer immunotherapy, chronic inflammation, wound healing, fibrosis, infection and foreign body-associated responses. Lastly, we discuss barriers to translation, including biological heterogeneity, dosimetry, biosafety, manufacturing, and regulatory challenges, as well as new opportunities based on artificial intelligence, digital twins, real-time sensing, and closed-loop control. Together, these advances establish biomaterials as programmable interfaces that can dynamically integrate mechanical and biochemical cues to orchestrate and achieve a spatio-temporally precise immune regulation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Pathak et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: