Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Strong gravitational lensing tightly constrains the projected mass within the Einstein aperture, but what else imaging alone can recover for edge-on disc lenses remains untested against known truth. We construct HST/ACS-like mock observations of 35 edge-on TNG50 disc galaxies selected to resemble lenses from the Sloan WFC Edge-on Late-type Lens Survey (SWELLS), and fit them with a five-stage Source-Light-and-Mass workflow in PyAutoLens; the final model represents the lens mass distribution by scaling the Multi-Gaussian Expansion (MGE) foreground-light template with a global mass-to-light ratio and adding a spherical NFW halo. Decomposed fits succeed for 21 of the 35 systems; in the other 14, coherent MGE lens-light residuals prevent reliable modelling. For the successful subset, the Einstein radius and the total aperture mass are recovered with normalised median absolute deviation (NMAD) scatters of 0.3% and 0.7%. The global projected mass-weighted slope has an NMAD scatter of 10.3%, smaller than that of the mass-sheet-invariant reduced deflection curvature $ξ$ (11.4%) and well below that of the local slope (40.7%), while the stellar and dark-matter aperture masses scatter by 15.1% and 108.8%. A 35-system true-light diagnostic using the exact input light gives component-mass scatters of 0.8% and 6.3%. Under these controlled assumptions, imaging constrains Einstein-scale total mass and global radial structure more reliably than local radial structure or the stellar-dark-matter decomposition.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Fang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: