Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Type of the article: Research ArticleAbstractReal GDP growth alone does not reveal whether economic expansion is productive, resilient, inclusive, institutionally grounded, or environmentally sustainable. This study develops a Directional Growth-Quality Conditions Index (DGQCI) for Armenia for 2003–2023. The composite contains 22 indicators in six dimensions: sources of economic growth, macroeconomic stability, human capital, structural transformation and innovation, institutional development, and inclusiveness and sustainability. Six context-dependent series (private and government consumption contributions, the real effective exchange rate, reserves, the current-account balance, and FDI/GDP) remain diagnostics but are excluded from aggregation. Publication requires at least 80% total indicator coverage and at least 50% of the intended indicators within every dimension; a stricter two-thirds rule is tested separately. Real GDP growth and the breadth of favorable growth-quality movements diverge substantially. Human capital has the highest average directional score, while inclusiveness and sustainability have the lowest. Results are highly stable to alternative weights, robust to a constant 16-indicator information set and to reassigning poverty to the inclusiveness dimension, but materially less concordant under magnitude-sensitive scoring. The DGQCI is therefore a directional monitoring tool, not a cardinal measure of welfare, causal policy impact, or the magnitude of socioeconomic progress.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Mkrtchyan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: