Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Goyal and Guruswami derive mutual correlated agreement (MCA) for the affine-line generator from line decodability, requiring n + 1 aligned challenges, where n is the block length. We prove that max(⌊δn⌋ + 2, 3) aligned challenges suffice when n < |F|, where δ is the proximity parameter. Using a classical counting argument, we replace an injection of challenges into coordinates with a double count of mismatch coordinates. This refinement improves the capacity-regime MCA upper bound for folded Reed–Solomon codes from (nt + 3t³)/|F| to ((δn + 2)t + 3t³)/|F|, where δ = 1 − ρ − 2/t, under the stated hypotheses. The counting technique has precedents in Ligero, Ben-Sasson–Kopparty–Saraf, and Haböck. Our contribution is applying it to the alignment argument of GG25, deriving the improved FRS bound, and formally verifying the resulting theorems in Lean 4 using ArkLib. Version 1.0.1 adds prior-art citations and clarifies the contribution. The mathematical results and Lean proofs are unchanged from version 1.0.0. Independent research preprint. Not peer reviewed.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nam Khanh Ngo (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: