Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Recent advances in artificial intelligence (AI) are accelerating digitalization in manufacturingoperations, yet many solutions remain difficult to scrutinize and operate in human-centeredways, which can hinder adoption. This study presents a systematic review to map primaryresearch on AI in manufacturing operations where human-AI collaboration is explicit orexplainable artificial intelligence (XAI) and human factors are addressed. Searches in Scopus andIEEE Xplore (2020 - 2026) identified 1.240 publications. After a rigorous screening, 177 studieswere included. All studies were coded through an operational lens combining decision domains(scheduling, maintenance, inspection-quality, process control, shop floor) with AI roles andevidence strength. The primary domains are maintenance and inspection-quality, where thedecision support is the most explored role. Furthermore, most of the studies lack a specific XAImodality, while lab and simulation environments are the most included studies. The reviewhighlights that a large share of AI research in operations is still maturing in its human-centeredoperationalization. We provide structured matrices to support evidence-based design andadoption of human-centered AI in manufacturing operations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Lecce et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: