Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Social determinants of health (SDOHs) are linked to inequities in digital health application (DHA) use and digital health literacy (DHL), a predictor of DHA use, but few studies have examined these inequities intersectionally. This study examined intersectional differences by gender, educational attainment, and generation. Methods: Data were obtained from an online cross-sectional survey (STELLAR; N = 1200) in Germany. Intersectionality was assessed using Multilevel Analysis of Individual Heterogeneity and Discriminatory Accuracy (MAIHDA), with the intersections of gender, educational attainment, and generation defining strata for both outcomes. Results: Educational attainment was the strongest predictor of DHL and was associated with DHA use; gender was not significant for either. Generation was associated with DHA use, with higher odds for Generation Y and Z than for Traditionalists, but was not associated with DHL. Predicted DHL was highest among women with higher education from the Traditionalist or Generation Y group and lowest among men with basic education from Generation Z. Predicted DHA use was highest among women with higher education from Generation Z and lowest among men with basic education from the Baby Boomer generation. Additive main effects explained a greater share of the between-stratum variance for DHA use than for DHL, while the proportion of total variance attributable to strata remained limited for both outcomes. Conclusions: MAIHDA can identify population groups at greater risk of second-level digital divide-related inequities in DHL and DHA use, informing population-level measures to strengthen DHL and improve DHA use. Further research should clarify the underlying mechanisms.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Hannemann et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: