Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this article, we examine teaching and learning with underrepresented international students in a postgraduate outdoor environmental education (OEE) programme in England. Using adapted duoethnography, two academics and a graduate share our perspectives through collaborative dialogue, critically reflecting on our roles, identities and lived experiences. A residential field trip emerges as a focal experience for shared insight, prompting dialogue about culturally shaped human-nature relationships. It also sparked difficult discussions about racial identity and belonging to outdoor places in the UK. We consider how programme teaching responded to a mainly Nigerian cohort and how a Western-centric curriculum marginalises or excludes the global majority. We highlight humanising pedagogy as a way to connect theory and practice with students’ lives, and explain how the research informed programme development, curriculum decolonisation, and more inclusive, socially just teaching.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Echefu et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 5 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: