Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Social networks are vital for public health information access, but they also accelerate the spread of high-risk or false content. Existing moderation approaches lack the precision and adaptability. We propose a rule and evidence enhanced risk assessment and risk-based dynamic communication decision-making framework to suppress the spread of health misinformation. By constructing a hierarchical evidence knowledge base, it leverages a knowledge-augmented large language model (LLM) to assess information risk along three fine-grained dimensions: logical consistency, source reliability, and semantic ambiguity. Propagation permissions of each node are dynamically adjusted by integrating risk score with node credibility and influence. Experimental results demonstrate that, compared to a general-purpose LLM, our method improves accuracy in identifying high-risk content and achieves a lower false-negative rate. In heterogeneous social network simulations, our framework achieves near-complete suppression of harmful misinformation without inadvertently blocking benign information. This work presents a computable, and explainable solution for balancing the free diffusion of health information and the prevention and control of risky information.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Xiong et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: