Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Despite substantial reductions in atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) events with intensive low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) lowering, considerable residual cardiovascular risk persists among individuals achieving guideline-recommended LDL-C targets. This residual risk reflects biological pathways not addressed by LDL-C lowering and remains a central challenge in preventive cardiology. This narrative review examines three overlapping domains: residual lipid risk related to triglyceride-rich lipoprotein remnants and excess apolipoprotein B-containing particles; genetically determined lipoprotein(a) [Lp(a)]-mediated risk; and residual inflammatory risk involving the NLRP3 inflammasome and downstream interleukin-1β and interleukin-6 signaling. Complementary biomarkers, including apolipoprotein B, non-HDL cholesterol, remnant cholesterol, Lp(a), and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, may help characterize residual-risk phenotypes beyond LDL-C alone, although their incremental value and influence on management vary with the strength of prognostic and causal evidence and the availability of effective therapies. Icosapent ethyl and low-dose colchicine have demonstrated cardiovascular benefit in selected high-risk populations, whereas the cardiovascular benefits of therapies targeting apoC-III, ANGPTL3, and Lp(a) remain under evaluation. Recent phase 3 findings have further underscored uncertainty regarding the cardiovascular benefit of interleukin-6 inhibition. Integrating complementary biomarkers with therapies supported by randomized outcomes evidence may enable a more individualized approach to residual cardiovascular risk reduction.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Nezhad et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: