Better than DFA? A Bayesian Method for Estimating the Hurst Exponent in Behavioral Sciences

. Specifically, DFA quantifies the linear regression slope in log-log coordinates representing the relationship between the time series' variability and the number of timescales over which this variability is computed. We compared the performance of two methods of fractal analysis-the current gold standard, DFA, and a Bayesian method that is not currently well-known in behavioral sciences: the Hurst-Kolmogorov (HK) method-in estimating the Hurst exponent of synthetic and empirical time series. Simulations demonstrate that the HK method consistently outperforms DFA in three important ways. The HK method: (i) accurately assesses long-range correlations when the measurement time series is short, (ii) shows minimal dispersion about the central tendency, and (iii) yields a point estimate that does not depend on the length of the measurement time series or its underlying Hurst exponent. Comparing the two methods using empirical time series from multiple settings further supports these findings. We conclude that applying DFA to synthetic time series and empirical time series during brief trials is unreliable and encourage the systematic application of the HK method to assess the Hurst exponent of empirical time series in behavioral sciences.