Key result
Pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics achieve ~69% overall TTR, with three-quarters of warfarin patients well controlled.
Why the study?
Warfarin has a narrow therapeutic index requiring frequent dose adjustment and monitoring, motivating an assessment of INR control and medication knowledge among patients attending pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics.
What is the level of International Normalized Ratio (INR) control, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and medication knowledge among patients receiving warfarin in a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic?
Cross-Sectional (n=200)
No
What is the level of International Normalized Ratio (INR) control, time in therapeutic range (TTR), and medication knowledge among patients receiving warfarin in a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic?
Patients managed in a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic in Jordan achieved an overall time in therapeutic range of 68.7% and high medication adherence (90%), though a quarter of patients still had poor TTR (<60%) and older age was weakly associated with lower warfarin knowledge.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Supports pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinics for acceptable TTR; leaves open randomized confirmation of outcome benefits versus usual care.
Background: Warfarin is an effective anticoagulant with a narrow therapeutic index. It requires frequent, careful dose adjustment and patient monitoring. This study assesses the International Normalized Ratio (INR) control among patients attending pharmacists-led anticoagulation clinics (ACCs). Methods: An observational cross-sectional study was conducted in ACCs from January to April 2022. INR control was assessed by calculating the proportion of the patient’s time in the therapeutic range (TTR) for the previous three months using the traditional method. The patient’s warfarin knowledge level was assessed using a patient knowledge questionnaire. Spearman correlation analysis investigated the association between questionnaire scores and the demographics. Results: Out of 211 approached patients, 200 patients were included (response rate 94.8%). TTR for all the patients was 68.7%. Out of 200, 113 (56.5%) patients had their INR within therapeutic range. Most patients (n=180, 90%) reported adherence to warfarin. Despite a relatively high mean patient knowledge score (76.1%), one-quarter of patients had poor TTR (TTR < 60%). A weak correlation existed between patients’ knowledge scores and older age (Rs=-0.203, p= 0.004). No significant correlation was observed between patient knowledge scores and other factors (gender or current INR). In multivariable logistic regression, patients having a higher INR showed a 36% increase in the odds of poor TTR (OR = 1.36, 95% CI [ 0.71, 2.61]). Conclusions: Most patients attending ACCs had within normal TTR and acceptable medication knowledge. Older patients had lower knowledge scores. More attention and close monitoring should be given to older patients and those with poor TTR.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Al-Odat et al. (2026) conducted a cross-sectional in Cardiovascular conditions requiring warfarin anticoagulation (primarily mechanical heart valve replacement and atrial fibrillation) (n=200). Warfarin therapy managed at a pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic was evaluated on Time in therapeutic range (TTR) over the previous 3 months. Pharmacist-led anticoagulation clinic management achieved an overall time in therapeutic range (TTR) of 68.7%, with 75.0% of warfarin patients maintaining good control (TTR ≥60%).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: