Key result
Anterior fat pad preservation fails to reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation during CABG compared to removal.
Why the study?
Because the epicardial anterior fat pad (AFP) is parasympathetically innervated, its routine excision during CABG might precipitate autonomic imbalance and induce postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF).
Does epicardial anterior fat pad maintenance reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?
RCT (n=180)
Blinded
Randomized
Does epicardial anterior fat pad maintenance reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting surgery?
Retaining the epicardial anterior fat pad during CABG surgery preserves parasympathetic tone (higher heart rate variability) but fails to reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation incidence or hospital costs.
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Anterior fat pad maintenance does not reduce POAF incidence; challenges parasympathetic innervation hypothesis and does not support adoption.
Objectives We conducted a randomized, blinded, controlled study evaluating the impact of anterior fat pad (AFP) maintenance on postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) incidence. Background Drugs with antiadrenergic effects reduce POAF. Because the epicardial AFP is parasympathetically innervated, its routine excision during coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) might precipitate autonomic imbalance and induce POAF. Methods Patients (n = 180, mean age = 66 +/- 10 years, 80% men, 5% with previous atrial fibrillation) undergoing CABG surgery were randomized to either AFP maintenance or AFP removal. Routine prophylaxis against POAF with beta-blockers (85%) and amiodarone (28%) was allowed on the basis of caregivers' discretion. The development of POAF, total hospital costs, and heart rate variability was compared between groups. Results Anterior fat pad maintenance did not reduce POAF incidence (34.8% vs. 35.2%, p = 0.950) or total hospital costs (data as medians with 25%, 75% percentiles: 22,940 dollars [17,629 dollars, 29,274 dollars] vs. 23,866 dollars [18,602 dollars, 30,370 dollars], p = 0.647) but was associated with higher heart rate variability (SD of normal-to-normal RR intervals [SDNN]: 31.7 +/- 24.6 vs. 22.7 +/- 8.3, p = 0.05 and SD of all 5-min mean RR intervals [SDANN 5]: 17.1 +/- 11.9 vs. 10.1 +/- 5.5, p = 0.003) than AFP removal. Conclusions Maintaining the AFP prevents attenuation of parasympathetic tone after CABG but does not reduce POAF or total hospital costs in any appreciable way.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
White et al. (2007) conducted an RCT in Postoperative atrial fibrillation in patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (n=180). Epicardial anterior fat pad (AFP) maintenance vs. Epicardial anterior fat pad (AFP) removal was evaluated on Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) incidence (p=0.950). Epicardial anterior fat pad maintenance during CABG did not reduce postoperative atrial fibrillation compared to removal (34.8% vs. 35.2%, p = 0.950).
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: