Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This paper addresses the problem of decentralized allocation of coverage zones among a group of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) for aerial photography, territory monitoring, search-and-rescue, and similar missions. It is noted that existing methods for allocating coverage zones for subsequent complete coverage (scanning) by UAVs rely on a central coordinator that is vulnerable to failures due to unstable communication and mission dynamics, scale poorly, and cannot reliably adapt to the dynamic conditions of a multi-agent coverage mission, whereas decentralized auction-based methods address the allocation of discrete point tasks, which limits their applicability to areal coverage. The aim of the work is to adapt the decentralized auction-based Consensus-Based Bundle Algorithm (CBBA) to the area-coverage problem, taking into account UAV heterogeneity in speed, sensor footprint width, and maneuvering cost while minimizing the total mission completion time. A modification of CBBA is proposed in which Voronoi zones are represented as separate algorithm tasks; after allocation, each zone is covered by the assigned agent (UAV) along a boustrophedon trajectory, which ensures complete scanning of the specified area. A task evaluation (score) function is formulated that accounts for the zone area, geometric complexity (turns), coverage and transit times, and individual UAV parameters; it is shown that the diminishing-marginal-gain property holds naturally, which guarantees auction convergence. A computational experiment (1080 runs) confirmed complete (100%) coverage of the operational space, consensus convergence within 10–23 iterations, and a planning time acceptable for onboard application. For heterogeneous UAV groups, the modified algorithm achieved the shortest mission completion time for all agent-count values, reducing the median mission time by 9%–77.6% on average relative to five comparison methods; for homogeneous groups it remains competitive. The predicted linear growth of mission time with an increasing number of agents enables scaling to large UAV groups and collective-mission tasks. Future work will extend the evaluation function to account for zone convexity (3D aspects) and the residual battery charge of UAVs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
О. Ю. Конорєв (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: