Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Ceramic-separator microbial fuel cells (MFCs) using earthen pots (100 mL) with stainless steel mesh anodes (42.6 cm 2 ) and graphite plate cathodes were operated to investigate kinetic relationships between substrate concentration (COD: 500–5000 mg/L; NO 3 − –N: 50–1850 mg/L at 5:1 C: N) and degradation rate/power generation. Steady-state datasets from four relationships: chemical oxygen demand (COD) versus COD degradation, COD versus power density, nitrate vs. nitrate degradation, and nitrate versus power density-were analysed using non-linear regression of 9 kinetic models in MATLAB (R2020a). A novel multi-criteria selection framework (R 2 + Root mean square error (RMSE) + mean absolute percentage error (MAPE) + corrected Akaike Information Criterion (AIC C ) + Bayesian Information Criterion (BIC)) was designed, which helped identify Edward model as optimal for COD degradation, Luong model for COD-power generation, and Edward model for both nitrate degradation and nitrate-power generation relationships. This study also helped establish precise operating windows, i.e., COD < 5.25 kg/m 3 and nitrate < 0.78 kg N/m 3 , to avoid inhibition. Substrate affinities (COD: 0.96–1.56 kg/m 3 ; Nitrate: 0.028–0.672 kg N/m 3 ) highlight ceramic MFCs’ suitability for low-to-moderate strength wastewaters. Compared to the literature, current systems show comparable affinity but lower inhibition thresholds, confirming concentration control as critical for optimization of performance. This statistically efficient multi-criteria approach challenges traditional R 2 -only model selection for engineering ceramic MFCs.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Bagchi et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: