Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Objective: This study aims to evaluate the feasibility of using measurement of calf circumference as an alternative method for assessing malnutrition status in children aged 1-5 years presenting to primary health care services.Method: Measurements of weight, height, mid-upper arm circumference (MUAC), and calf circumference were taken, and body mass index (BMI), weight-for-age, weight-for-height (WFH), height-for-age (HFA), and MUAC Z-scores were calculated for 210 study participants aged 1-5 years.Agreement between anthropometric measurements was assessed using Kappa agreement analysis.Receiver operating characteristic analysis was performed to determine cut-off values for calf circumference so as to discriminate between undernutrition and obesity.Results: According to Olcay Neyzi reference values, the prevalence rates of undernutrition were calculated as indicated based on WFH (10%), WAG (18.6%),HFA (17.6%), and MUAC (17.2%)Z-scores.The prevalence rates of overweight/obesity were estimated as indicated according to WFH (19.1%),BMI (21.5%), and MUAC (12.3%)Z-scores.Moderate agreement was observed between WFH and MUAC Z-scores, while high agreement was found between WAG and MUAC Z-scores.A high level of agreement was also observed between BMI and WFH in the assessment of obesity.Calf circumference Z-score cut-off values of ≥0.433 for obesity (area under the curve 0.83-0.84)and ≤-0.523 for malnutrition (area under the curve 0.77-0.88)were identified, with wide 95% bootstrap confidence intervals.Conclusion: Calf circumference measurement can be a practical tool for assessing nutritional status in children; however, the recommended cut-off values need to be validated in independent populations.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Karaaslan et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: