Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Rural tourism is often promoted as a means of advancing gender equality, yet little is known about how women’s empowerment translates into lasting behavioral support for tourism, particularly outside a few well-studied regions. Drawing on Empowerment Theory, Social Exchange Theory and the Capability Approach, this study tests a model in which women’s economic, social and political empowerment shape their satisfaction with tourism, which influences participation and long-term support for tourism development, both directly and through participation. A census survey covered 194 female residents of Saty village, Kazakhstan, recognized as a UN Tourism Best Tourism Village (initial response rate 87.8%; effective rate 81.5%). Structural equation modelling with 5,000 bias-corrected bootstrap resamples confirmed a six-factor measurement model and supported all ten hypothesized paths. Social empowerment was the strongest predictor of satisfaction (β = 0.332), followed by economic (β = 0.262) and political empowerment (β = 0.215). Satisfaction predicted participation (β = 0.377), and support was predicted by both participation (β = 0.243) and satisfaction (β = 0.286). Participation partially mediated the effect of satisfaction on support (indirect β = 0.091; total β = 0.378). Satisfaction also carried the effects of economic (β = 0.099), social (β = 0.125) and political empowerment (β = 0.081) to participation. The results show that satisfaction acts both as a direct driver of advocacy and as an indirect route to support. Social empowerment, understood as recognition, skill development and access to networks, emerges as the main lever for gender-responsive tourism policy in Central Asia.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Akbar et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: