Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Efficient fertilizer application is vital for crop productivity, but conventional broadcasting is labor-intensive, time-consuming and often leads to uneven distribution, whereas UAVs offer a precise alternative. This study developed and evaluated a UAV-mounted spreading disc mechanism for urea application to improve distribution uniformity and optimize operational parameters. The system comprises a rectangular hopper (39° slope), a flow control unit, and interchangeable discs with 2–6 vanes. Laboratory trials followed a factorial design with flight height (1–3 m) and vane number (2–6), assessing fertilizer deposition using tray collectors and evaluating uniformity via coefficient of variation (CV). Deposition patterns were consistently right-skewed. Increasing vane number improved uniformity, reducing CV from 55.80% (2 vanes) to 38.21% (6 vanes). Higher flight height and lateral distance decreased uniformity, with CV increasing from 36.04% at 1 m to 56.03% at 3 m, and from 21.08% at 2 m to 70.83% at 20 m. Optimal performance occurred at 2 m flight height with 6 vanes, achieving a CV of 30.37% at 4 m lateral distance. The study demonstrates that UAV-mounted spreading disc mechanisms can effectively complement conventional ground equipment by enhancing efficiency and precision in fertilizer management.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Soni et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: