Key result
Pharmacist-led antiplatelet deprescribing recommendations achieve ~80% combined acceptance by providers and patients.
Why the study?
Concomitant anticoagulant and antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome increases bleeding risk without reducing cardiovascular risk over anticoagulation alone, prompting evaluation of an antiplatelet deprescribing stewardship service.
Does a pharmacist-led antiplatelet stewardship service achieve high provider and patient acceptance of single antiplatelet deprescribing in patients with atrial fibrillation on concomitant oral anticoagulation?
Cohort (n=71)
No
Does a pharmacist-led antiplatelet stewardship service achieve high provider and patient acceptance of single antiplatelet deprescribing in patients with atrial fibrillation on concomitant oral anticoagulation?
A pharmacist-led stewardship initiative effectively identified inappropriate concomitant antiplatelet therapy in atrial fibrillation patients on oral anticoagulants and achieved high deprescribing acceptance among both providers (92.6%) and patients (86.0%).
Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Pharmacist-led deprescribing shows high acceptance in AF on OAC; hypothesis-generating and should not yet change practice.
Concomitant therapy with anticoagulants and antiplatelets in patients with atrial fibrillation and chronic coronary syndrome significantly increases the risk of bleeding with no added reduction in cardiovascular disease risk over anticoagulation alone. The primary objective was to evaluate an evidence-based antiplatelet stewardship service designed to deprescribe single antiplatelet therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation receiving oral anticoagulants and a single antiplatelet therapy for both primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. This retrospective study included adult patients aged older than 18 years with atrial fibrillation who were seen at a tertiary academic heart failure center and received therapeutic oral anticoagulants and single antiplatelet therapy for any cardiovascular secondary or primary prevention. The primary outcome was the acceptance of the antiplatelet deprescribing intervention by both providers and patients. The secondary outcomes included provider- or patient-accepted antiplatelet deprescribing intervention. A total of 71 patients were included in the final cohort of this study. The most common indication for the antiplatelet therapy was chronic coronary disease at 69.0 % followed by primary prevention at 14.1% and stroke at 11.3%. The most common antiplatelet therapy was aspirin 81 mg once daily (83.1%), followed by clopidogrel 75 mg once daily(16.9%). Among the 71 patients, 54 (76.1%) were on non-guideline directed antiplatelet therapy. Of the 54 recommendations, 50 (92.6%) were accepted by the providers, and 43 of the 50 provider-accepted recommendations (86.0%) were accepted by the patients. Conclusion: A pharmacist-led antiplatelet deprescribing service is feasible in a tertiary heart failure cardiology outpatient setting. Most recommendations were accepted by the providers and patients.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kido et al. (2026) conducted a cohort in Atrial fibrillation receiving concomitant oral anticoagulants and single antiplatelet therapy (n=71). Pharmacist-led antiplatelet therapy stewardship deprescribing service was evaluated on Acceptance of the antiplatelet deprescribing intervention by both providers and patients. Pharmacist-led antiplatelet deprescribing recommendations were accepted by 92.6% (50/54) of providers, and 86.0% (43/50) of those were accepted by patients.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: