Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Reunion of paper #267's two items, gated jointly: D-257-272-43 (packet #382 -- the target's two printings recomputed under the doubling rule: corrected 1.60% typical / 4.40% worst per lens and 0.60% / 1.66% at the seven-lens sample; older 1.40% / 4.20% and 0.53% / 1.59%; no number moves by more than 0.07 of a percentage point and no verdict moves) and D-257-272-44 (packet #405 -- the sample-level range [0.60%, 1.60%] typical is the complete answer the record supports: rho-table 0.605 to 1.600, both ends attained by joint laws with identical marginals). INCREMENTAL. Quantum gravity NOT SOLVED; vacuum catastrophe NOT SOLVED.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
William Alexander Aldred (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: