Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Aims: To evaluate postoperative C-reactive protein (CRP) for ruling out anastomotic leakage (AL) after digestive resection in a cohort including several anastomotic sites.Patients & methods: Prospective single-centre diagnostic accuracy study (STARD 2015) of 82 consecutive patients with an unprotected digestive anastomosis (January 2024–August 2025). CRP was measured on postoperative days (POD) 1, 3 and 5. No analysis was formally prespecified. The primary analysis excluded leaks diagnosed on or before POD 5; a strict analysis also excluded four leaks with an undated diagnosis.Results: AL occurred in 12 patients (14.6%). CRP discriminated on POD 3 (area under the curve [AUC] 0.83; 95% CI: 0.71–0.95) and POD 5 (AUC 0.88; 0.78–0.98) but not on POD 1 in the 71 patients with an available value (AUC 0.59). In the primary pre-diagnosis analysis (79 patients, 9 leaks), an exploratory, data-derived POD 5 cutoff of 127 mg/L had a sensitivity of 77.8% (40.0–97.2) and a negative predictive value of 96.4% (87.7–99.6); in the strict analysis (75 patients, 5 leaks), sensitivity was 80.0% and NPV 98.2%. In the full cohort, sensitivity was 83.3% (apparent) and 76.5% (optimism-corrected). Both false negatives followed gastric resection.Conclusion: A low POD 5 CRP makes AL unlikely, particularly after non-gastric resection, but these data-derived thresholds are exploratory, do not support any change in discharge practice and require external validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sghaier et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: