Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
In this paper, we show that there is no time-space tradeoff in incremental open addressing: there is an incremental open-addressed hash table that supports $O(1)$ worst-case expected time insertions, positive queries, and negative queries, at any load factor (even load factor $1$). As an intermediate result, we also revisit the problem of constructing an incremental open-addressed hash table that does not perform reordering (does not move elements around over time). In this setting, we show that it is possible to get $O(1)$ amortized expected positive query time together with $O(1)$ worst-case expected insertion time, a combination that was not previously known to be possible.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Farach-Colton et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: