Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
We prove Paul Curtz's six-residue denominator conjecture in OEIS A189733, revision 12, COMMENTS (May 23, 2011), now in revision 36, FORMULA, with its convention that zero has denominator one. Following Gao's earlier generating-function proof, we derive exact values of the first row of the defining rational array. These values also prove the six-periodic numerator assertion, the denominator recurrence, and Barker's empirical generating function in the same entry. The same formulas settle Barker's recurrence and generating-function conjectures in A267068 and give the numerator identities in A278718. We also prove the full-array reflection and binomial-transform identity. The corresponding second-kind array yields A194767's denominator formulas and reciprocal sum, and corrects an index in its fourth-diagonal numerator identity. For the unsigned-seed array in A189731 and A242926, the same argument gives a Lucas-number formula and refutes the asserted prime-only integer ranks at the composite 705. An integer triangular transformation determines antidiagonal denominator lcms for arbitrary rational seeds.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ma et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: