Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
The management of a cryptocurrency portfolio is difficult since it involves the high volatility and non-stationarity of the cryptocurrency market. Therefore, financial management strategies cannot be directly applied. In this paper, a deep reinforcement learning optimization technique (DRL-PPO) is discussed and compared with supervised predictive models like LSTM, Random Forest, and XGBoost in the task of optimization of a portfolio with ten different cryptocurrencies, taking into account the transaction fee of 0.1%. The results have shown that DRL-PPO outperforms other methods in this case, providing an annualized return of 37.22% and Sharpe ratio of 0.87. It is worth mentioning that the DRL-PPO technique is market neutral (beta = − 0.08) and alpha equals 46.41%. Meanwhile, the disadvantages of supervised predictive models are revealed in periods of reversal of the trend; LSTM provides 6.75%, while Random Forest provides 23.54%, being subject to fluctuations in the market (beta approximately equal to 1). Finally, XGBoost provides a negative number (-1.48%) which does not even cover the transaction fees. Summarizing, the success of DRL-PPO is not based on directional accuracy but rather on the ability to optimize trading efficiency and manage risks.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Kehal et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: