The Residue Restricts No Count: The Azygos Model Run Against the Sever's Complete Classification

Runs paper #207's complete fixed-point classification of the sever's pairing operator (every odd count from 1 to 411 occurs; the declared 11 is one of 206) against paper #206's tracked-pairing residue model rho_res = A f0 I mu^4, taken as the stated class it prints. A premise audit shows the two classes share no object: the residue model has no grain total, no self-twin population, and no grain involution; the sever classification has no momentum, no incoherent fraction, and no tracking scale. Product models are then exhibited -- nine members of the residue family against all 206 sever states, 1,854 joint models, each pairing verified grain by grain and the residue exhibits invariant across the sweep -- so the achievable set is the full parity set and the residue model excludes zero counts. Every proper subset in the neighbourhood is assigned to the added bridge that owns it: the literal mode-to-grain transcription gives the singleton 411 only under an identification neither parent owns, the sign transcription gives a distribution (mean 16.185, probability 0.0679 at 11), and the neutral transcription centres on 11 only by spending the declared fraction 11/411 itself. One gate note is printed at its size: paper #206's text gives its toll family range as 0.105-0.53 while its own grid, QA and metadata give 0.095-0.53. The toll 411/400 stays declared and unproduced; the toll fence is not touched. Quantum gravity NOT SOLVED; vacuum catastrophe NOT SOLVED.