Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Masonry dwellings in tropical Indonesia often exceed the indoor comfort range on hot afternoons, encouraging reliance on split-unit air conditioning (AC). This study presents a design-stage assessment of a partition wall containing 918 polyethylene spheres (12 cm) filled with a coconut oil–fly ash composite phase change material (PCM; 50 vol% oil, 40 vol% fly ash, 10 vol% air) and assisted by exhaust fans (24 W in total), for two bedrooms of a Type-36 house in Bandung. A Maxwell-Eucken estimate indicates that fly ash raises the composite thermal conductivity from 0.17 to about 0.32 W/m·K (0.24–0.36 W/m·K). A quasi-steady melting analysis shows that capsule charging is limited mainly by surface convection: the latent heat absorbed during a 5-h afternoon (2.0–3.7 kWh for the whole wall) is similar to that of pure-oil capsules, while the composite uses 44% less oil and completes its melting cycle faster. The installed 373.8 kg of oil corresponds to a theoretical air-temperature reduction of up to 4.0 °C in the 49.5 m³ rooms. A steady-state CFD simulation (Butterfly/OpenFOAM) for the EPW design hour (9 December, 14:00; outdoor 29.0 °C), with the PCM surface prescribed at 25.5 °C, gives an indoor air temperature of 26.33 °C against 28.30 °C for brick partitions, within the ASHRAE 55 adaptive comfort limits. Operating electricity and CO₂ emissions are 95–97% lower than for two ½ PK AC units, with a simple payback of about 3.3 years; as the AC provides lower temperatures and dehumidification, these are upper bounds. Transient coupled simulation and prototype testing are required for validation.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Jurizat et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: