Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background/Objectives: Intermittent claudication (IC) secondary to peripheral artery disease (PAD) causes exertional leg pain and discomfort, which limits functional walking capacity. The clinical efficacy of Ginkgo biloba extract (GBE) as a therapeutic agent for IC is debatable. This systematic review and meta-analysis evaluated the efficacy and safety of GBE compared with a placebo in patients with IC due to PAD. Methods: Databases including PubMed, Embase, the Cochrane Library, and CINAHL were searched until 24 April 2026. Eligible studies included randomized, double-blind, controlled trials (RCTs) comparing placebo. Primary outcome was absolute claudication distance (ACD) at the end of the study. Secondary outcomes were initial claudication distance (ICD), ankle-brachial index (ABI), ankle pressure, and adverse events. Walking outcomes across various treadmill protocols were standardized to estimate caloric expenditure (kcal). A random-effects model was used to pool the effect estimates across trials. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool (RoB 2). Results: A total of 14 RCTs comprising 893 participants represent the total number randomized were included. GBE was associated with a statistically significant but modest improvement in ACD compared with placebo (mean difference [MD], 3.50 kcal; 95% CI, 0.02 to 6.98; p = 0.049). This benefit was significant in trials with a 24-week duration (MD, 4.67 kcal; 95% CI, 2.26 to 7.08; p < 0.001) but not in 12–16 weeks trials (MD, 1.35 kcal; 95% CI, −2.39 to 5.09; p = 0.48). No significant changes were observed for ICD or resting ABI/ankle pressure. GBE was well tolerated, with an overall adverse event incidence comparable to placebo. Conclusions: In patients with IC due to PAD, GBE therapy improves absolute walking performance, with a significant effect observed in trials evaluating 24 weeks of treatment. Given its favorable safety and tolerability profile, GBE can represent a clinically relevant and well-tolerated therapeutic option to support functional walking capacity, particularly for patients unable to tolerate or use conventional pharmacological agents.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Ohe et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: