Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
This article develops a relational account of appeal within political representation theory. Appeal is defined as the relational generation of affective investment in a political figure, movement or performance, encompassing attachment through attraction and rejection. The argument extends constructivist accounts of constituency formation by identifying a lateral dimension: responses circulate among publics, allowing those who refuse a representative claim to help shape the constituency it gathers. Oppositional amplification specifies one such process. Through antagonistic certification, hostility becomes evidence of a figure's credentials among another public and can strengthen its investment. Far-right performances offer a revealing setting because transgression and the construction of enemies give condemnation a predictable role. Bolsonaro, Trump and Milei serve as theoretical illustrations of this shared mechanism across different affective registers. The article specifies its limits and empirical traces, opening a comparative agenda in the study of political appeal beyond the far right while examining how rejection can participate in the relations it contests.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sebastián Ronderos (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: