Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Large Audio Language Models (LALMs) enable generative reasoning over complex acoustic scenes but often exhibit prediction instability. We show that this variability can serve as a reliability metric via inference-time self-consistency and confidence-aware aggregation. Using a log-probability--based scoring framework, candidate answers are weighted by model likelihoods, leveraging reasoning diversity and self-certainty without additional training. Experiments on four LALMs, including Qwen3-Omni and Audio Flamingo 3, demonstrate that confidence-aware aggregation improves accuracy and calibration, with additive methods like Borda voting outperforming classical Majority Vote, especially under high disagreement. This approach transforms LALM variability into a source of reliability for scalable and robust multimodal audio understanding. Project code is available at https://github.com/michelolzam/lalm-self-consistency.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Olvera et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: