Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Background Wildfire is a primary disturbance controlling soil organic carbon density (SOCD) in cold temperate forests. However, depth-dependent fire effects are rarely evaluated together with land-use transitions and forest stand structure within a single process framework, limiting fire–carbon management in northern forests. Methods In Yakeshi City, western Greater Khingan Mountains, China, we integrated fire records (2000–2023), multi-temporal land use/cover data, 91 soil profiles (0–100 cm), remote-sensing stand classification, and plot surveys. Fire intensity × recovery-time effects were tested using two-way ANOVA. Carbon-loss rates were compared across fire intensities and frequencies. Land-use transition effects on 0–30 cm SOCD and stand-structure controls were quantified using ANOVA and generalized linear models (GLMs). Results Fire was the strongest near-surface carbon-loss process. Fire intensity, recovery time, and their interaction significantly affected stratified SOCD ( P < 0.05). Severe fires caused the largest losses, mainly in 0–40 cm soils. One year after fire, 0–100 cm SOCD declined by approximately 27.5%; after 5 and 10 years it recovered to approximately 87.2% and 94.9% of pre-fire levels, yet severe-burn sites remained approximately 8.7% below unburned references after a decade. Single-fire 0–100 cm loss rates ranged from 13.8% to 41.3% and increased with intensity; sites burned ≥ 3 times lost approximately 35.7%. Forest-to-cropland, forest-to-grassland, and forest-to-unused-land transitions reduced 0–30 cm SOCD by 34.8%, 22.7%, and 17.4%, whereas cropland-to-forest conversion increased SOCD by 12.8%. Larix gmelinii had the highest 0–100 cm SOCD (4.21 kg m⁻²), followed by Pinus sylvestris var. mongolica (3.83 kg m⁻²). GLMs showed that dominant species, stand density, and canopy closure significantly regulated SOCD; a 10% increase in canopy closure was associated with + 1.09 kg m⁻² in 0–100 cm SOCD. Conclusions In this cold temperate forest landscape, fire attributes shape the depth and persistence of SOCD loss and recovery, while land-use transitions and stand structure modify carbon baselines and within-forest retention. Reducing high-severity short-interval reburns, limiting forest conversion, and maintaining structurally stable coniferous stands are process-consistent priorities for soil carbon conservation, within the constraints of the chronosequence sample.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Zhang et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 8 closely related papers on similar clinical questions. Consider them for comparative context: