Answers are grounded in this paper and cite their sources.
Three-dimensional synthetic porous models were generated using an improved Quartet Structure Generation Set (QSGS) method to examine heavy oil displacement. Flow and heat transfer were coupled, with a one-way thermoelastic response on a fixed geometry. Between-axis anisotropy was distinguished from the response to inlet–outlet reversal. In the main model, reversal changed absolute permeability by no more than 0.062%, whereas water saturation indicators at 0.5 s differed by 7.2%, 1.2%, and 31.3% along X, Y, and Z. An additional ensemble of 15 realizations was compared using saturation-based incremental recovery referenced to each initialized oil volume. Within the common supported range up to 2.90 injected pore volumes (PV), the one-sided growth design showed negative reverse-minus-forward gaps in all five realizations at every evaluated checkpoint from 0.5 PV. At 1 PV, the mean gap was −17.08 percentage points with a sample standard deviation of 6.20. The isotropic and symmetric designs showed smaller means with mixed individual signs. These results support directional sensitivity within the tested structures while distinguishing fixed-time throughput effects from matched-PV comparisons. The growth-probability trend remains an association for the selected geometries, and the finite-time results do not establish ultimate recovery.
No takes yet. Share an insight, caveat, or question.
Sun et al. (2026) studied this question.
Synapse has enriched 10 related papers. Consider them for comparative context: